文章出来了,把自己发SCI的过程写出来与大家分享 ：
在论坛看了很多发表文章的经验,从中学了很多技巧,现在文章发表了，特写点东西回馈.希望对别人有用。 Journal: ACS里比较低的，影响因子2左右,呵呵，头一篇SCI，低了些。
1. 首先一定要注意杂志的发表范围， 超出范围的千万别投,要不就是浪费时间;另外，每个杂志都有他们的具体格式要求，一定要按照他们的要求把论文写好，免得浪费时间，最好看看最近几期的文章，大致有所了解.
2.对于我们工科的学生，要想写出论文来，必须读一定数量的文献,了解其他人的思路和实验方法,从中借鉴,拟订出自己的方案,为什么要做这试验（实验背景及目的），怎么来做（实验步骤），根据自己的经验猜测可能会得到什么样的结果等等,千万不要盲目上马,否则容易得不偿失.
3.论文有充足的数据及结论作为支撑，这里所说的数据不一定要很好，但一定能够证明你论文中的结论.数据中不是特别好的，要适当校正，否则,审稿专家肯定就它提出问题，解释起来还麻烦，还不如提前处理好.
4.文章的前言部分,最好从大牛文章中"借用"一些好句子,我就借用了 几个好的长句子,把主要内容换成自己的关键词.其中一个句子三层递进结构，自己读起来都爽,人家大牛就是牛啊.估计就是文章的一个亮点吧.呵呵
5.文章出来了，最好找其他人读读，特别是英文方面的.我老板在国外快10年了，修改了2次，审稿人及编辑都还提出了很多英语方面的修改意见哪,由此可见其重要.
下面把和期刊的拉锯过程介绍如下:
_____________________________________________
5月20日投稿
cover letter
Dear Editor:
We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled " ********", which we wish to be considered for publication in Journal of *******. The work described has not been submitted elsewhere for publication, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.
We believe that two aspects of this manuscript will make it interesting to general readers of Journal of ****. First, we report the ********* at atmospheric pressure. This provides the first physiological evidence information can be used to establish a relation between aqueous and non-aqueous solutions of salts and to estimate a change in the properties of the solution with the properties of the solvent. Second, *************.
The corresponding author: ********
________________________________________________
7月20日左右收到一审修改意见,给了两个月修改时间,下面是期刊来信
Revision Requested for Manuscript ID ***
Journal: Journal of ******
Manuscript ID: ***
Title: "***********************"
Author(s): ***
Dear Prof:
I am pleased to inform you that the reviews for your manuscript have now been received. Given below are the comments of the reviewers (one is in an attached file). Please make appropriate changes to the manuscript and resubmit your revised manuscript. In addition please supply a list of changes and rebuttals as requested below. The policy of Journal of ******** is to ask one of the original reviewers to review your manuscript again. That reviewer will be supplied with all the reviewers?comments.
To revise your manuscript, log into ACS Paragon Plus at http://paragonplus.acs.org/login and select "My Authoring Activity". There you will find your manuscript title listed under "Revisions Requested by Editorial Office." Your original files are available to you when you upload your revised manuscript. If you are replacing files, please remove the old version of the file from the manuscript before uploading the new file.
When submitting your revised manuscript through ACS Paragon Plus, you will be able to respond to the comments made by the reviewer(s) in the text box provided or by attaching a file containing your detailed responses to all of the points raised by the reviewers.
Prior to submitting the manuscript, ensure that the manuscript addresses the following points:
Format: Your revised manuscript must adhere to ACS format, especially references. For your convenience I have enclosed Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data guidelines for authors. Note that in ACS Paragon Plus, authors have the option of embedding graphics into the manuscript or supplying graphics separately.
Supporting Information: A paragraph titled Supporting Information Available should be included after the acknowledgement paragraph. The last line of the paragraph should read as follows: This information is available free of charge via the Internet at http: //pubs.acs.org.
Copyright: A copyright form is included. If you have not provided the signed copyright form for your manuscript, please upload a signed and scanned copy of the form with the revised manuscript, or fax it to **********, or e-mail it to *****.
I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.
If you have not already done so I would very much appreciate if you could update your reviewer expertise on your Paragon Plus home site.
Sincerely,
_____________________________________________________
------------------------------------
Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:
Reviewer: 1
Recommendation: Publish after minor revisions noted.
Comments:
Review attached.
Please rate the overall importance of this to the field of chemical and engineering data (10 - High Importance / 1 - Low Importance): 5
Reviewer: 2
Recommendation: Publish after major revisions noted.
___________________________________________________
头一个审稿专家的意见是小修,提出的问题比较多，但都是语法和用词的问题，按照他说的去做就ok了
第二个专家的意见是大修,5个问题,问题就是我前面提到的数据问题,实验方法的选择问题等,详细解释就可以了，最好是带有数据支持,这样更有说服力.
呵呵，修改比较容易，碰到奥运会就没办法了，看完奥运会才给修改稿发了上去.时间为8月25左右.
下面是给编辑的回复信
Dear Editor ****：
Thank you very much for your kind letter and encouragement, along with the constructive comments of the reviewers concerning our manuscript (Manuscript ID: *****). We have thoroughly considered all the comments of two reviewers and substantially revised our manuscript.
The point-to-point answers and explanations for all comments were listed in a separate following this letter.
We have tried our best to address all the concerns raised by the reviewers. We hope, with these modifications and improvements based on your suggestion and the reviewers comments, the quality of our manuscript would meet the publication standard of Journal of ***************.Once again, we acknowledge your comments and constructive suggestions very much, which are valuable in improving the quality of our manuscript.
If you have any question about this , please contact us without hesitate.
The corresponding author:
___________________________________________________
9月5日左右，接到2审意见.都是语法和用词问题,估计是语法编辑的工作了.没说的，人家怎么说，就怎么改.10日左右再次把修改稿发回.这下估计该有戏了,忐忑不安的等啊.呵呵,一天上5次系统看状态
终于,系统状态变了,revision accepted
_______________________________________________________
以上就是俺SCi的过程,希望能对论坛中的同学们有帮助，那样兄弟也就不白敲打这些字了
能给个评价就更好了,祝福大家!!
本文来自: 中国经济学教育科研网论坛(http://bbs.efnchina.com) 详细出处参考：http://bbs.efnchina.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=12625&ID=409586
